Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GDJMSP, post: 322932, member: 112&quot;]Rabone, I understand your point. But the examples you use are the exceptions to the rule rather than the rule. For every example you can point to like the &#039;99 sets or the &#039;95-W ASE - I can point to a hundred that did not perform.</p><p><br /></p><p>The author has a valid point, speaking in general terms, coins issued prior to 1964 perform far better than those minted after &#039;64 in regard to profit potential. It&#039;s a simple fact and easy for anyone to confirm. </p><p><br /></p><p>Now perhaps in the future this will not be the case. But it has already been 44 years since 1964 and it has proved to be the case ever since then.</p><p><br /></p><p>Now, all of that being said - I used to collect moderns. But I did so because I liked them, not because I ever expected to have any profit. However, there were some cases where I did. Like the &#039;95-W set you mentioned along with a few others.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in