Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;BooksB4Coins, post: 2102785, member: 36230&quot;]Context..... compared to many, many, many other dates/mints in a series stretching over 100 years, a date/mint with a mintage a tad over 19 million (which has nothing to do with present-day survivors) could reasonably be argued as being &quot;<i>tougher</i>&quot;. 1931-P at 19.3+ million vs. 1982-P at 10.7+ BILLION? Hmm.... &quot;<i>tougher</i>&quot;? Indeed.</p><p><br /></p><p>I also didn&#039;t see where it was claimed the coin was &quot;<i>scarce</i>&quot;, but I digress.</p><p><br /></p><p>Seriously though... it is simple marketing. Would you expect the seller to offer as &quot;<i>common and easily obtained</i>&quot;? Ebay is full of listings using questionable descriptors, but the same could be said for most everything and everywhere; there is no reason to let it bother you, and with this seller in particular, this &quot;<i>offense</i>&quot; isn&#039;t worthy of a blip on the radar.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in