Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Ex-Liberal, post: 673162, member: 19904&quot;]Like back in the days when people could leave their doors unlocked--when &quot;community&quot; was substantive and not a &quot;progressive&quot; buzzword? A private heads-up to a neighbor hardly equates to the Stasi. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Don&#039;t get me wrong, I see what you&#039;re saying. But I don&#039;t see some gigantic slippery philosophical slope here. If the dealer in her experience senses something that might be untoward, she can make a good-faith effort at a follow-up. Or not. If the chances of juvenile hijinx are 10% and cell phones ubiquitous, the probability of actually using a caller ID callback to &quot;unravel a plot&quot; fall to what, 1,000 to 1-ish? <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> Mostly it would salve the dealer&#039;s conscience.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>But aren&#039;t inconsequential moral dilemmas the most fun?</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><br /></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Ditto. </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>BTW, I also put one chocolate-covered Saint Gaudens down on the Sacajawea theory, which one can always take to the bank and trade in for a <i>real</i> dollar. . .to paraphrase Marge Simpson![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in