Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Busting out 1957-1964 Proof Sets from US Mint plastic holders to put in safer holders?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="johnmilton, post: 7823987, member: 101855"][ATTACH=full]1344477[/ATTACH] </p><p>[ATTACH=full]1344478[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>The Capital and Capital style holders provide good protection so long as they were not contaminated with some impurity before the coins when into them. Some people go as far to say that these holders should not be re-used if the coins originally mounted in them are replaced. I think that is a little over the top. </p><p><br /></p><p>I bought this 1950 Proof set in this holder more than 30 years ago. The toning you see on these coins was there when I bought it. In my perception, this set has not changed over that time. Therefore I would say that these holders provide very good but no perfect protection from chemical changes. They provide excellent protection from physical damage, <b><i>if the coins do not rattle. </i></b>Although some of these style holders have a rattle problem, it's been my experience that the Capital brand holders have virtually no problems with that. </p><p><br /></p><p>As a bit of advice to beginning collectors, don't be put off if an older set like this has some toning, especially on the silver coins. Toning is a natural process. I would much rather have an old silver Proof coin that has never been dipped over one that has been dipped white. Undipped coins have better luster and are more attractive in my opinion. Chances are the dipped white coin will tone again, and sometimes the results from that are not pretty.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="johnmilton, post: 7823987, member: 101855"][ATTACH=full]1344477[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1344478[/ATTACH] The Capital and Capital style holders provide good protection so long as they were not contaminated with some impurity before the coins when into them. Some people go as far to say that these holders should not be re-used if the coins originally mounted in them are replaced. I think that is a little over the top. I bought this 1950 Proof set in this holder more than 30 years ago. The toning you see on these coins was there when I bought it. In my perception, this set has not changed over that time. Therefore I would say that these holders provide very good but no perfect protection from chemical changes. They provide excellent protection from physical damage, [B][I]if the coins do not rattle. [/I][/B]Although some of these style holders have a rattle problem, it's been my experience that the Capital brand holders have virtually no problems with that. As a bit of advice to beginning collectors, don't be put off if an older set like this has some toning, especially on the silver coins. Toning is a natural process. I would much rather have an old silver Proof coin that has never been dipped over one that has been dipped white. Undipped coins have better luster and are more attractive in my opinion. Chances are the dipped white coin will tone again, and sometimes the results from that are not pretty.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Busting out 1957-1964 Proof Sets from US Mint plastic holders to put in safer holders?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...