Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Business strikes are considerably rarer than proofs?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="samjimmy, post: 184141, member: 3813"]I was looking at a coin, this time from 1869 where the business strike mintage was 423,700 and it's stated that they (the business strikes) are "considerably rarer than proofs" of this issue (mintages of the proofs was 600). Now, I can understand it might be harder to find MS60 and above, and maybe that's what they meant, but it doesn't appear so and that's not what it said. It seems they are saying that the business strikes are just flat-out more rare ("considerably rarer").</p><p><br /></p><p>I'm just wondering how that's possible. That would mean that *over* 99.8% of them (422,853) were destroyed, shipped to another country, melted, or otherwise MIA -and that's assuming that *all* 600 proofs remain intact and accounted for. I find it hard to believe that is possible (that *all* 600 proofs remain today so who knows what the current number is), so let's say the number is closer to 99.9% of all the business strikes being MIA (leaving ~423) to make them "considerably rarer."</p><p><br /></p><p>Someone explain this to me, please.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><font size="1"><i>Source: <a href="http://cgi.liveauctions.ebay.com/5227-1869-S-1-PR63-PCGS-Business-strikes-of-this-issu_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQcategoryZ52618QQihZ007QQitemZ170062552184QQrdZ1" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://cgi.liveauctions.ebay.com/5227-1869-S-1-PR63-PCGS-Business-strikes-of-this-issu_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQcategoryZ52618QQihZ007QQitemZ170062552184QQrdZ1" rel="nofollow">http://cgi.liveauctions.ebay.com/5227-1869-S-1-PR63-PCGS-Business-strikes-of-this-issu_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQcategoryZ52618QQihZ007QQitemZ170062552184QQrdZ1</a></i></font>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="samjimmy, post: 184141, member: 3813"]I was looking at a coin, this time from 1869 where the business strike mintage was 423,700 and it's stated that they (the business strikes) are "considerably rarer than proofs" of this issue (mintages of the proofs was 600). Now, I can understand it might be harder to find MS60 and above, and maybe that's what they meant, but it doesn't appear so and that's not what it said. It seems they are saying that the business strikes are just flat-out more rare ("considerably rarer"). I'm just wondering how that's possible. That would mean that *over* 99.8% of them (422,853) were destroyed, shipped to another country, melted, or otherwise MIA -and that's assuming that *all* 600 proofs remain intact and accounted for. I find it hard to believe that is possible (that *all* 600 proofs remain today so who knows what the current number is), so let's say the number is closer to 99.9% of all the business strikes being MIA (leaving ~423) to make them "considerably rarer." Someone explain this to me, please. [size=1][i]Source: [url]http://cgi.liveauctions.ebay.com/5227-1869-S-1-PR63-PCGS-Business-strikes-of-this-issu_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQcategoryZ52618QQihZ007QQitemZ170062552184QQrdZ1[/url][/i][/size][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Business strikes are considerably rarer than proofs?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...