Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Broken Celt
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2379657, member: 19463"]A question is what is 'reasonable'. My general rule of thumb is they are worth no more than 1/4 of a whole coin. Of course that depends not only on how broken it is but whether the coin is, as Ken points out, prone to being broken or if there is an explanation for its being broken. The best example of this last IMO are the Archaic Greek coins that were test cut so severely that some were halved or coins like the Nemausis crocs or English silver pennies that were regularly cut/broken for change. These coins are not damaged but just showing signs of their life as circulating coinage. Such coins are worth 'less' but far from worthless. Why are Gepid imitations broken? Were they poorly made or was it local practice to break coins for some reason? </p><p><br /></p><p>Eliminating coins with an excuse, I am hard on broken coins. Caesar elephants show up chipped or broken more than many issues just from being poorly made. I value the one below at much less than an intact coin. 1/4 almost seems harsh since the break hardly shows on the elephant side. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]487690[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>The Commodus Flaviopolis Provincial below was bought in a moment of weakness because I liked the reverse busts of Seraphis and Isis.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]487689[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>I feel the coin is worth about 1/4 what it would with a smooth edge. However, it is many times better than the one on Wildwinds which I would value far lower and wonder why the type seems prone to breakage. </p><p><img src="http://www.wildwinds.com/coins/ric/commodus/_flaviopolis_SNGFr_2182.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p>...but CNG shows four intact ones from past sales ranging from $60 to $650 so my coin loses any special protected status and is just a damaged coin worth about the $29 I paid for it(????). Would I buy it again? Good question. </p><p><br /></p><p>As far as Bing's coin goes, I'll point out that it was broken on the 'correct' side to retain both designs. The same fraction of a flan losing the nose and the horse head would be much worse IMHO. I might have Bing's coin but I would avoid the opposite option.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2379657, member: 19463"]A question is what is 'reasonable'. My general rule of thumb is they are worth no more than 1/4 of a whole coin. Of course that depends not only on how broken it is but whether the coin is, as Ken points out, prone to being broken or if there is an explanation for its being broken. The best example of this last IMO are the Archaic Greek coins that were test cut so severely that some were halved or coins like the Nemausis crocs or English silver pennies that were regularly cut/broken for change. These coins are not damaged but just showing signs of their life as circulating coinage. Such coins are worth 'less' but far from worthless. Why are Gepid imitations broken? Were they poorly made or was it local practice to break coins for some reason? Eliminating coins with an excuse, I am hard on broken coins. Caesar elephants show up chipped or broken more than many issues just from being poorly made. I value the one below at much less than an intact coin. 1/4 almost seems harsh since the break hardly shows on the elephant side. [ATTACH=full]487690[/ATTACH] The Commodus Flaviopolis Provincial below was bought in a moment of weakness because I liked the reverse busts of Seraphis and Isis. [ATTACH=full]487689[/ATTACH] I feel the coin is worth about 1/4 what it would with a smooth edge. However, it is many times better than the one on Wildwinds which I would value far lower and wonder why the type seems prone to breakage. [IMG]http://www.wildwinds.com/coins/ric/commodus/_flaviopolis_SNGFr_2182.jpg[/IMG] ...but CNG shows four intact ones from past sales ranging from $60 to $650 so my coin loses any special protected status and is just a damaged coin worth about the $29 I paid for it(????). Would I buy it again? Good question. As far as Bing's coin goes, I'll point out that it was broken on the 'correct' side to retain both designs. The same fraction of a flan losing the nose and the horse head would be much worse IMHO. I might have Bing's coin but I would avoid the opposite option.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Broken Celt
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...