Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;dougsmit, post: 1867084, member: 19463&quot;]That is the way I took it.&nbsp; Correct???&nbsp; The coin is dated but using the Roman system to 137 AD.&nbsp; The system breaks down here a bit.&nbsp; I take ND to mean there was a date but it can&#039;t be read on this coin while UD means there never was an L or Etoys number.&nbsp; To be consistent, if it had been my choice (which it was not!) I would list a previously unknown year of a known reverse (x14) rather than just (14).&nbsp; Petty, petty, petty.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>I also fail to find a way to separate a coin marked LH from one marked ETOYC H but it might be there somewhere.&nbsp; Your review of the book written a year from today would be much better but I believe your first impressions as posted were better than anyone here four or five times your age would do.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in