Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
CoinTalk
>
What's it Worth
>
Blank Obverse / Uniface ? / Rare Mint Error ? Wheatback Penny
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="GrizzlyGold, post: 1733388, member: 55226"]OK, just so you know, I have no pride of ownership in this coin. Also, I'm not a typical penny-poker. I see a lot of rare coins, and plenty more not-so-rare coins. When I first talked to the guy who owns it, I was in the same place as all of you: It's got to be PMD. I would just assume it be PMD, so I can buy it cheap. However, through objective analysis, I am not yet convinced it is post-mint. And, as much as I'd like to take your word, what I'd really like is for someone to convince me beyond a doubt that this is not a mint error. So far, you're failing me. I'd like an expert explanation of how the dies and minting works, and why then, this could NOT be from the mint. Or, in the least, follow my lines of reason, and disprove me with a solid understanding of the common laws of physics.</p><p><br /></p><p>If it is post-mint, I agree, it would have to be vice related. But this is why I'm still not convinced:</p><p><br /></p><p>Look at the wheat ears. They are near-perfect. </p><p>If this was done in a vice, and you pressed one coin into another, I would expect the reverse of this coin to be marred by the obverse of the other coin. This is not the case. The wheat ears and reverse design is not flattened or marred. I don't believe the mirror image of the obverse to be caused by another coin pressing into the reverse, otherwise you would be damaging / flattening the wheat-back design in some way.</p><p><br /></p><p>The blank side has no remnants of a design. There is evidence that this did start out as a rimmed planchet (see left of blank side). There is not evidence of there ever being a design on the blank side. If you put this in a vice, and had enough pressure/force to completely flatten a once normal coin to the point of no trace of a design ever being present, why then, is the other side of the coin otherwise flawless, except for the mirrored ghosting? It goes against the laws of physics, unless you are pressing down on the coin with the inverse of the design, ie, a die. </p><p><br /></p><p>OK, so if not a vice, then a grinder? I really don't think so. It weighs exactly what a standard copper penny weighs, and if you're grinding a penny, why does it look mushed?</p><p><br /></p><p>If I'm wrong, please be more convincing in disproving me. Give it some thought. Thanks. I really do appreciate a thoughtful discussion here.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="GrizzlyGold, post: 1733388, member: 55226"]OK, just so you know, I have no pride of ownership in this coin. Also, I'm not a typical penny-poker. I see a lot of rare coins, and plenty more not-so-rare coins. When I first talked to the guy who owns it, I was in the same place as all of you: It's got to be PMD. I would just assume it be PMD, so I can buy it cheap. However, through objective analysis, I am not yet convinced it is post-mint. And, as much as I'd like to take your word, what I'd really like is for someone to convince me beyond a doubt that this is not a mint error. So far, you're failing me. I'd like an expert explanation of how the dies and minting works, and why then, this could NOT be from the mint. Or, in the least, follow my lines of reason, and disprove me with a solid understanding of the common laws of physics. If it is post-mint, I agree, it would have to be vice related. But this is why I'm still not convinced: Look at the wheat ears. They are near-perfect. If this was done in a vice, and you pressed one coin into another, I would expect the reverse of this coin to be marred by the obverse of the other coin. This is not the case. The wheat ears and reverse design is not flattened or marred. I don't believe the mirror image of the obverse to be caused by another coin pressing into the reverse, otherwise you would be damaging / flattening the wheat-back design in some way. The blank side has no remnants of a design. There is evidence that this did start out as a rimmed planchet (see left of blank side). There is not evidence of there ever being a design on the blank side. If you put this in a vice, and had enough pressure/force to completely flatten a once normal coin to the point of no trace of a design ever being present, why then, is the other side of the coin otherwise flawless, except for the mirrored ghosting? It goes against the laws of physics, unless you are pressing down on the coin with the inverse of the design, ie, a die. OK, so if not a vice, then a grinder? I really don't think so. It weighs exactly what a standard copper penny weighs, and if you're grinding a penny, why does it look mushed? If I'm wrong, please be more convincing in disproving me. Give it some thought. Thanks. I really do appreciate a thoughtful discussion here.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
CoinTalk
>
What's it Worth
>
Blank Obverse / Uniface ? / Rare Mint Error ? Wheatback Penny
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...