I changed my profile photo to the reverse of this coin. So, I thought it was fitting to give my reason, and also show some true, examples of the coin, (at least the truest that I have taken). It shows an In Direct Die Transfer.
I think I know what OP is trying to state . They say this is caused from a worn die . As we can see . Op coin is know where near a worn die .. Which means the facts are incorrect ..
I think I know what OP is trying to state . They say this is caused from a worn die . As we can see . Op coin is know where near a worn die ..
For all you wondering, this was some how double posted, the threads were combined. The quarter came from the same 40% silver set.
Are you sure that's the obverse of the same dollar? The reason I ask is that is the obverse of a type II, and the reverse is type I. All of the 40% silver striking's should be type II on both sides. In fact I've never seen a Bicentennial dollar that wasn't the same type on both sides.
That's the true obv. Good catch, not that I knew, I just liked the die transfer. I will have to do more research.
Error in my previous post the Bicentennial 40% silver's are type I not type II. Still should not have two different types on one coin. If you actually have a coin with different types on each side that's much more important than the design transfer.
