Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;eddiespin, post: 2123279, member: 4920&quot;]Let me ask you something, Kurt. Is there any toning that doesn&#039;t involve &quot;artifice,&quot; i.e., human intervention? If you concede there isn&#039;t, what is it with the maintenance of these arbitrary distinctions, natural and artificial?</p><p><br /></p><p>To the degree we&#039;re marginally conscious of the foregoing, why not just collect the toning we like, without regard to condemning the toning we don&#039;t like? If we like certain patterns of toning, collect them. Just because the majority maintains a distinction between natural and artificial doesn&#039;t mean the distinction exists and the latter should be condemned. There was a time when the majority maintained a distinction between humans and witches and the latter was condemned. Same thing going on, here.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in