Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Lehigh96, post: 2122685, member: 15309&quot;]David,</p><p><br /></p><p>How are you coming to the conclusion that those 4 coins are AT?&nbsp; Within the confines of this thread, we have seen that it is impossible to determine the originality of toning with 100% certainty.&nbsp; In addition, we have seen coins graded by the TPGs which are indeed AT.</p><p><br /></p><p>The only 2 coins that I think we can definitively call AT are coins #5 and #7.&nbsp; Coin #5 because no Morgan Dollar tones like that.&nbsp; The colors are wrong as are the progressions.&nbsp; But even that coin has some indicators of NT.&nbsp; It is obviously supposed to be an EOR toned Morgan, but if the colors in that photo are accurate, there is no way it is anything but AT.</p><p><br /></p><p>The other coin is #7, the 1965 Kennedy Half Dollar.&nbsp; The reason I called that coin AT was because I used to own it, and that is my photograph.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/beautifully-artificially-toned-kennedy-half-dollar.84403/" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/beautifully-artificially-toned-kennedy-half-dollar.84403/">Beautifully Artificially Toned--Kennedy Half Dollar</a></p><p><br /></p><p>The fact is that you are making determinations about the originality of toning from photographs.&nbsp; My photograph makes that coin look less questionable than it really is.&nbsp; Likewise, the photograph of #9 is ridiculously bad and there is no way it looks like that at all.&nbsp; If you saw that Morgan in hand you might change your mind.&nbsp; I personally have never seen an AT Morgan with pull away toning.</p><p><br /></p><p>Can you tell us which of these coins are raw/graded and provide the grades of those that are graded?&nbsp; Thanks!</p><p><br /></p><p>Paul[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in