Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="Bedford, post: 169471, member: 4917"]<a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ih=014&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWA%3AIT&viewitem=&item=330052381289&rd=1&rd=1" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ih=014&sspagename=STRK%3AMEWA%3AIT&viewitem=&item=330052381289&rd=1&rd=1" rel="nofollow">link</a>If you look at these notes 1st off the 65 PMG graded note has been changed- The grade has been altered from a AU55 to a 65 the note does not even have the qualities to be graded 65 it has wrinkles thru the signature & also on the right side below the series & date and a dot on the ring around the portrait along with smudeges on the left corner ! Not to mention the margins- It also says under the grade that it is About uncirculated ! For a 65 - I think not ! It would read Gem Unc. if it were really 65- The 6 is darker in color than the 5 too - The CGA AU55 says Bankstamp & it appears to me that the "bankstamp" has been altered out- Just a heads up to anyone looking at this auction- It looked too good to be true & it is , PLEASE DO NOT BID ON THESE - TRUST ME-[/QUOTE]