Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Better pictures of the 1896 PL that caused much debate.
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Morgandude11, post: 4591405, member: 37839"]It is my lowest graded Morgan I own, except for the 1893s at AU 50. I have hundreds of Morgans—no way this is a 62. I have 64s and 65s that are as clean. Yes, I acknowledge there are a few bag marks, and some die polish lines in the obverse rear fields, but not enough for a 62. That was my point of the OP. Is it gem? Not likely, but 63 or 64PL? Sure.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Morgandude11, post: 4591405, member: 37839"]It is my lowest graded Morgan I own, except for the 1893s at AU 50. I have hundreds of Morgans—no way this is a 62. I have 64s and 65s that are as clean. Yes, I acknowledge there are a few bag marks, and some die polish lines in the obverse rear fields, but not enough for a 62. That was my point of the OP. Is it gem? Not likely, but 63 or 64PL? Sure.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Better pictures of the 1896 PL that caused much debate.
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...