Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Paper Money
>
Better Images of the $10 National Reverse
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="CamaroDMD, post: 425334, member: 5233"]I'm sure it is supposed to be. The ship on the image doesn't match any US battleship perfectly, I think it is a bit of a generic image. But, the features pictured match a Kearsarge Class more closely than any ship I know of. But, they don't match it perfectly either. I'd imagine details we changed to either make the note easier to engrave, to make it better fit on the note, and just at the artists discretion (either the artist didn't do his homework or wanted the ship to look "better"...and I think the ship on the note looks amazing).</p><p><br /></p><p>Just as an example of it not matching a Kearsarge Class perfectly is the ship in the note doesn't have small defensive gun emplacements along it's side. A Kearsarge Class Battleship had a cabin setup along the side with small guns. The Battleship on the note doesn't. It has more of a railing like a New York Class.</p><p><br /></p><p>The major features of the ship on the note (number and location of large guns, masts, stacks, the bridge, ect) match a Kearsarge Class but there are smaller features that don't.</p><p><br /></p><p>Here is an example of what I mean by those side gun emplacements. This is the USS Kentucky (BB-6) which was the second and final Kearsarge Class Battleship: <a href="http://joeschwartz.net/extras/landenberger/USS%20Kentucky.jpg" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://joeschwartz.net/extras/landenberger/USS%20Kentucky.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://joeschwartz.net/extras/landenberger/USS Kentucky.jpg</a>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="CamaroDMD, post: 425334, member: 5233"]I'm sure it is supposed to be. The ship on the image doesn't match any US battleship perfectly, I think it is a bit of a generic image. But, the features pictured match a Kearsarge Class more closely than any ship I know of. But, they don't match it perfectly either. I'd imagine details we changed to either make the note easier to engrave, to make it better fit on the note, and just at the artists discretion (either the artist didn't do his homework or wanted the ship to look "better"...and I think the ship on the note looks amazing). Just as an example of it not matching a Kearsarge Class perfectly is the ship in the note doesn't have small defensive gun emplacements along it's side. A Kearsarge Class Battleship had a cabin setup along the side with small guns. The Battleship on the note doesn't. It has more of a railing like a New York Class. The major features of the ship on the note (number and location of large guns, masts, stacks, the bridge, ect) match a Kearsarge Class but there are smaller features that don't. Here is an example of what I mean by those side gun emplacements. This is the USS Kentucky (BB-6) which was the second and final Kearsarge Class Battleship: [url]http://joeschwartz.net/extras/landenberger/USS%20Kentucky.jpg[/url][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Paper Money
>
Better Images of the $10 National Reverse
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...