Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Jesh, post: 624353, member: 16382&quot;]Alright. I met with Laura earlier today. She is a nice person and explained things very well. Unfortunately she confirmed some things that I had a feeling of, and that other members had pointed out. The 1901 is definetely a 64 in a 65 holder. This comment was made about half a year ago on cointalk, even from pictures. The 1894 is nothing fancy, and I wanted to get rid of it - this one I knew was overgraded too. The 1910-D had issues also, and someone commented on this too a while back I believe (was dipped).</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>So I got 3750.00 for the 1901, 1750.00 for the 1894 and 6000.00 for the 1910-D.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>I ended up picking up two coins, which are very nice:</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>1852 PCGS MS65 - CAC&#039;d:</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>[ATTACH]50761.vB[/ATTACH]</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>1907 No Motto PCGS MS65 - CAC&#039;d:</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>[ATTACH]50762.vB[/ATTACH]</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>I am much happier with this $10.&nbsp; Both coins are excellent!!![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in