Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;lordmarcovan, post: 7131173, member: 10461&quot;]I concur.&nbsp; This pretty much echoes my (admittedly uninformed) thought process on the matter.&nbsp; If it&#039;s a contemporary counterfeit from the 1700s, that&#039;s not all bad news, because as you say, then it is still collectible in its own right.</p><p><br /></p><p>Personally, whether it&#039;s a crude variety of an official strike, or a contemporary counterfeit, it&#039;s over 200 years old in either case.&nbsp; I&#039;m nearly certain it is not a <i>modern</i> fake of any kind.&nbsp; It&#039;s interesting, regardless.</p><p><br /></p><p>Since it came from a large bulk lot (which I did <i>very</i> well on, thank you very much), even if one were to consider it as the lone &quot;dud&quot; from that lot,&nbsp; I have no cause for complaint.&nbsp; I think did just fine, for the money I paid for it, as a one fifty-ninth portion of that source lot.&nbsp; A relatively trifling sum when you average it out.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in