Beck's File#T174 1962D,1998 DDO? And a 1982D No D? Movie.

I like the 1962D its too big and glittering in the dim light...So I decided to take some pic. The 1998 again glittering with the slight slim doubling. The 1982D No D is a story that just goes on till I finally get one with a D...God Williing.. even the shallow writing on the jacket is the visble as the one online. The slash on the eyebrow (somehow my coin has it too, and the slash on the 9. How can all this markers show up? There is lot of activity under the date area showing somone earsed it at the mint ( my thoughts).Maybe they had trouble with the mint mark (posibble)? God Willing we have a winner.



God Bless,
Baba Beck.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

I AM NOT clicking on the you tube video link. It appears that his only intention is to increase the number of views on his videos. If this is anything like his previous videos, it will be filled with unsubstantiated claims, inaccuracies, and small blurry pictures of his perceived "rarity".

The moderators have previously explained why they don't want to suspend this user, even though it's clear that the OP is not seriously asking for help, nor providing useful information. If he really wants help, he has been asked to provide screen shots, which he refuses to do. IMO, this is self promotion, but I do not enforce the rules.

Please consider NOT clicking on the video link, if you also feel the OP is just engaging in self promotion.

 

The 1962-D on the cover pic of your video is mechanical (machine) doubling. (I refuse to click on your videos) It is very common and adds no value to the coin.

You can check Wexler's Doubled Die website for an explanation on how dies are made and look under the "Worthless Doubling" tab for a detailed explanation of Mechanical doubling

 

Please don't feed the troll.

 

I'm not clicking it!

 

@GDJMSP @desertgem @lordmarcovan ...So what was the explanation? Oldhoopster makes a valid point and I will not view anything Beck posts...Spark

 

Still, a gigantic waste of time. You guys rule the roost, I'll just keep ignoring him...Spark

 

If you believe he's a troll then your advise makes sense. However, after reading a number of his posts, it doesn't appear as if the OP is a troll trying to stir up trouble.

IMO, it appears that he just wants to build views for his videos. Why? Who knows? But, until such a time when the OP demonstrates that he wants to have a dialog about his possible errors and more importantly, demonstrates that he is making corrections to his videos to update the inaccurate info - which many agree are polluting youtube and causing harm to the hobby - I'll continue to recommend that CT members should consider to OPs possible motivations before adding another view to the video.

BTW: I do agree that it's pointless to continue to report the OPs post. You've made it clear why he's not violating site rules.

 

I know why.
Youtube pays cash for videos based on the number of views.
He's trolling for views.
More views equals more money in his pocket.

 

When I see his handle, I just keep moving on. When his posts stop getting ANY feed back, maybe he will move on.

 

It doesn’t matter. Nearly all of us enjoy trying to help others learn about the hobby (and in the process, learn new things ourselves). But I dislike when somebody tries to take advantage of our community. Whether it’s a troll stirring up trouble, somebody trying to cheat members out of money, or duping them into clicking on their video for the primary purpose of increasing the number of views, others should know what they are doing.

I had no idea planman was scamming other members and I may have fallen for it if it wasn’t for other members bringing it the attention of the community. Becks’s stuff isn’t as significant, but when somebody is trying to take advantage of Coin Talk, members should be made aware.

Just my 1864 Two Cent opinion

 

Not to mention the info in the video isn't wrong in most cases.

 

Buy/Sell/Trade must be in the classified forums.

 

You're going to want to delete your number, sir. If not the mods will do it for you and for your own benefit.

That said, welcome to the forum.

 

It's a good thing Doug is kind enough to share the forum definition of "self-promotion" since it just happens to differ greatly from the accepted...


"Promoting or publicizing oneself or one's activities, especially in a forceful way.

‘a conceited, self-promoting charlatan’"

-Oxford Dictionary


"the act or practice of promoting one's own interests, profile, etc"

-Collins Dictionary


This place can be so confusing at times....