Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;SuperDave, post: 2374749, member: 1892&quot;]Sometimes we get so caught up in the details that we fail to ask the larger, disqualifying questions. What candidate is there to satisfy your theory which measures less than 18mm?</p><p><br /></p><p>On a more detail-oriented note, the only thing I see on the larger original images which seems anomalous is what looks like field beveling below and left of the date. The rest you&#039;ve highlighted seems explainable via metal flow artifacts during the strike or polishing related to a previous clash (in front of the profile).</p><p><br /></p><p>This one might be a double-whammy - a coin with serious clash-related die polishing which has subsequently been cleaned. I can&#039;t get over the fact that those heavy &quot;brushmarks&quot; ought to have appeared to proceed over the devices in these specific photos. Like I said before, I&#039;d throw a few bucks at it to see exactly what&#039;s up. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in