Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Bare head of Antoninus Pius
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 3377964, member: 19463"]This is a very good point that new collectors might learn. The word 'rare' is much abused. If there are a hundred examples and a thousand people want them, a coin might be termed rare but what do we call a coin known by two or three examples? Maridvnvm and I each have some rare coins of Septimius Severus with matching dies. Many of the dies we see are immediately recognizable to us because we have seen a good percentage of all the dies used in the period of our interest. Several reverses are only known to us from one die so all examples that turn up are die matched. There never were many of these coins and fewer survive. On the other hand there are coins where it is a red letter day when you find a die match. The same type was made in huge numbers using enough dies that the issue could be called common if only a few examples of each die survived. </p><p><br /></p><p>There is a rare exception in the coinage of Pescennius Niger. A random sample of a thousand of his coins will show many more dies than a thousand Eastern mint Septimius from the first period when the two were fighting would show. We find fewer die matches in those coins. I take this as evidence that there once were many more coins of Pescennius than there are now. This supports the theory that Septimius outlawed the possession of the coins of his defeated enemy. Sometimes exceptions to rules prove interesting since we have to ask why.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 3377964, member: 19463"]This is a very good point that new collectors might learn. The word 'rare' is much abused. If there are a hundred examples and a thousand people want them, a coin might be termed rare but what do we call a coin known by two or three examples? Maridvnvm and I each have some rare coins of Septimius Severus with matching dies. Many of the dies we see are immediately recognizable to us because we have seen a good percentage of all the dies used in the period of our interest. Several reverses are only known to us from one die so all examples that turn up are die matched. There never were many of these coins and fewer survive. On the other hand there are coins where it is a red letter day when you find a die match. The same type was made in huge numbers using enough dies that the issue could be called common if only a few examples of each die survived. There is a rare exception in the coinage of Pescennius Niger. A random sample of a thousand of his coins will show many more dies than a thousand Eastern mint Septimius from the first period when the two were fighting would show. We find fewer die matches in those coins. I take this as evidence that there once were many more coins of Pescennius than there are now. This supports the theory that Septimius outlawed the possession of the coins of his defeated enemy. Sometimes exceptions to rules prove interesting since we have to ask why.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Bare head of Antoninus Pius
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...