Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Barbaric vs Official Issues
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 4541955, member: 19463"]When we give an RIC reference number from this period we must give either the mint (as Victor did) or page number since there would be several RIC 118's in the book. There is no catch-all RIC number for a coin with illegible mintmark but many can be identified by style. The second coin shows a considerable double or over strike. I don't know if it is barbarous or just confused. I agree it looks strange and you may well be right.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 4541955, member: 19463"]When we give an RIC reference number from this period we must give either the mint (as Victor did) or page number since there would be several RIC 118's in the book. There is no catch-all RIC number for a coin with illegible mintmark but many can be identified by style. The second coin shows a considerable double or over strike. I don't know if it is barbarous or just confused. I agree it looks strange and you may well be right.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Barbaric vs Official Issues
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...