Yes, and no. Some scanner images are vastly superior to the seller pics I posted, but it's hard to get a coin to really "shine" with a scanner. They tend to look very flat. The quality of the image can get great, but not really show the coin how it looks in-hand. But the same thing can be said of camera photos. You can have great scanner photos and crappy camera photos, and vice-versa.
Probably my best example of this. An 1889-P, NGC MS-62. eBay listing picture: My picture, with proper lighting:
There's some unfortunate scuffing on the slab plastic in that area. The coin itself is well-struck with full breast feathers.
funny you mention that just won these for face value + $2 shipping last night including a blurry picture
Paid $22 for this coin, Anacs graded it VF-20 *Scratched*.. its on its way back to me. Even scratched thats a heck of a price difference
Took a gamble on a 4 hour auction. Paid $70 for an 1802 Large Cent based on bad pictures. Looks at least VG...will see how it looks when I get it in-hand this week.
I completely forgot about this post!! This was 3 and a half years ago haha. Unfortunately I'm away at college right now so I can't get pictures since the coin is back home, but it is still in my collection. Surfaces are much better in-hand with a full LIBERTY on the obverse. I'd call it at least a G06-VG08, a good pickup for $70
This one was from a while ago. The top image was the sellers. The coin as it is in hand and with my own image. I was pleased