Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Jack D. Young, post: 8449407, member: 93371&quot;]OK, I look at examples like this as opportunities to learn...</p><p><br /></p><p>From one of a group of bad internet sellers and bad holders is this 1886-O Morgan.</p><p><br /></p><p>We found the genuine one sold in a GC auction and the bad one on the Bay.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1497528[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>&nbsp;[ATTACH=full]1497529[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1497530[/ATTACH] </p><p>[ATTACH=full]1497531[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>What I was told in another forum by Daniel Carr is the reverse of the &quot;coin&quot; in the bad holder is the WRONG REVERSE for the date! The &quot;type 4&quot; reverse was used 1st well after 1886...</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1497532[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1497533[/ATTACH] </p><p>The chart is one Daniel provided in the other forum as well as the image of the reverse types.</p><p><br /></p><p>Best, Jack.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in