Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Valentinian, post: 2755399, member: 44316&quot;]I don&#039;t understand how this is compatible with the countermark [USER=19463]@dougsmit[/USER] showed </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I have the countermark on a coin commonly attributed to Datames 378-372 BC (now sometimes read &quot;Tadanmu&quot;)</p><p>[ATTACH=full]632074[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>AR22-19. 10.81 grams. </p><p>ANSMN 31 (1986) page 45, plate 2.20, countermark 7, page 61.</p><p>SNG von Aulock 5940 with c/m (their c/m at 9:00/3:00 instead of our 2:30/9:00). </p><p>DeCallatay RRQEMA&amp;C type 276, with 296 examples of the type (not including the c/m) from 106 dies. </p><p>Sear Greek 5644</p><p><br /></p><p>So, it looks more like the bull is associated with Ba&#039;al. If so, it seems the &quot;lion attacking bull&quot; type must mean something else.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in