Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Coinchemistry 2012, post: 2608365, member: 28107&quot;]Several points here:&nbsp; First, examples did surface after the original melt that were subsequently destroyed, showing that the original Mint records and count were inaccurate to begin with.&nbsp; Second, the fact that PCGS is offering a reward suggests to a lay person that the coins <i>could</i> exist and thus Carr pieces could be used for fraud.&nbsp; Third, the coins need not currently exist to run afoul of the provisions.&nbsp; Fourth, counterfeits, reproductions, or copies need not be exact (i.e. to include date variations to fantasy dates) are insufficient to change the legal status of the coin.&nbsp; I&#039;m saying that your argument is missing the entire point, and it doesn&#039;t matter either way legally.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in