Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;JCro57, post: 3140372, member: 92083&quot;]One of the errors I collect includes detached clad layers (specifically, a high grade example for each modern clad denomination, both an obverse and a reverse, and if at a good price, a partially unplated for each as well; if possible, a genuine one missing both sides would be awesome). This one WAS a clam shell error (which I DO NOT collect), but notice <b><i>the outer clad shell came off inside the slab</i></b>, and is now detached.</p><p><br /></p><p>This is neat for two reasons. First, the detached layer is a 40% silver-clad layer, which I have never seen at shows or on recent auctions, nor do I own one until now. Second, I might send this in to have it re-slabbed as a mated pair - the coin missing the clad layer (which will become Coin #1), and the EXACT shell which came off of it (coin #2).</p><p><br /></p><p>But I have one question for y&#039;all. I am considering three options. which is the best one in your opinion?</p><p><br /></p><p>a. Resubmit it to PCGS as a mated pair, but in separate holders.</p><p>b. Resubmit it to PCGS as a mated pair, but in a larger single holder.</p><p>c. DO not resubmit it at all; it is much more cool left as is.</p><p><br /></p><p>I am leaning toward choice A. What do you guys think?</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]802757[/ATTACH]</p><p>[ATTACH=full]802758[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in