Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;dougsmit, post: 2822896, member: 19463&quot;]I have major reservations with these numbers and many others of the sort due to the way &#039;averages&#039; were handled.&nbsp; This is largely due to the figure for 193-215 which covers the period I collect most intensively.&nbsp; It soon becomes obvious that there were changes in standards up and down during this period and not all line up with reign changes.&nbsp; The charts ignore mints but I have no way of telling if branch mint products were included in the samples.&nbsp; It is interesting that they recognized the rise under Pertinax and fall under Julianus (a three month period) but treated long reigns without subdivisions collectors can observe.&nbsp; The charts are a nice place to start but should not be taken too seriously without more study.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in