Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;900fine, post: 402391, member: 6036&quot;]I think the best we could ever hope for is automated analysis of details, nicks / bagginess, impact of minor problems (rim bumps), and luster. Maybe planchet porosity (EACs).</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>That&#039;s a pretty big head start.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>I think it would ultimately lead to a continuum of grade, not the quantized system we have now. IOW, using all numbers. So you would have F-12, 13, 14, ... 19. Then VF20, 21, 22, ... 39. Then XF40...49.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Stick with integers, no need for decimals. The computer would compute a number like 48.783 and round to the nearest whole number.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The descriptors G, VG, F, etc would be despensible, but would stay around a lo-o-o-o-o-n-g time as a vestige.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in