Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;satootoko, post: 22840, member: 669&quot;]If I&#039;m reading you correctly Gary, you are measuring from inside the rims.&nbsp; To illustrate Jody&#039;s comment, click on <a href="http://images.snapfish.com/33%3B%3C%3B65523232%7Ffp63%3Dwp%3E232%3B%3D4%3A%3B%3D724%3DXROQDF%3E2323592323346wp1lsi" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://images.snapfish.com/33%3B%3C%3B65523232%7Ffp63%3Dwp%3E232%3B%3D4%3A%3B%3D724%3DXROQDF%3E2323592323346wp1lsi" rel="nofollow">this link</a> to see a 15mm coin being measured with metal verniers.</p><p><br /></p><p>Assuming that your measurements are correct, I&#039;m suspicious of the &#039;22 and really doubt that the &#039;29 is genuine.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>.12 mm is definitely beyond the rounding accuracy of your vernier, so that makes the &#039;22 vary from spec significantly, although not enough to be considered a broadstrike from somehow escaping the collar.&nbsp; The measurements in this case are inconclusive IMHO.</p><p><br /></p><p>The &#039;29 is not only much wider, but noticeably heavier.&nbsp; Weight tolerances were tightly controlled, even extending to the use of filing &quot;adjustment marks&quot;.&nbsp; IMHO the measurements in this case lean strongly in the wrong direction.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in