Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Aurelian's "undated" coins
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Gavin Richardson, post: 2796584, member: 83956"]So since I can’t afford to buy new coins right now, I’m getting further acquainted with RIC and trying to provide RIC numbers and dates for coins that I picked up in uncleaned lots years ago. I’m struck by how many of the 3rd century “crisis and recovery” coins are undated by RIC. Take Aurelian, for example. It seems that when I track down the RIC number, the coin belongs to a certain “period” of his "undated coins," leaving me simply to date the coin to his general reign of 270-275 A.D.</p><p><br /></p><p>Pictured is RIC 5.151; from Part 1 of RIC volume 5, p. 281. According to RIC, this coin was struck during “Period III” of his undated coins, but that doesn’t seem to do me much good in dating the coin. Maybe I'm missing something or using RIC incorrectly.</p><p><br /></p><p>Has more progress been made in dating the coins of Aurelian and his 3rd-century cohorts? Is there a trick to dating these “periods” defined by RIC? Or are the regnal years the best we can do for most coins of this chaotic period?</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]650734[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Gavin Richardson, post: 2796584, member: 83956"]So since I can’t afford to buy new coins right now, I’m getting further acquainted with RIC and trying to provide RIC numbers and dates for coins that I picked up in uncleaned lots years ago. I’m struck by how many of the 3rd century “crisis and recovery” coins are undated by RIC. Take Aurelian, for example. It seems that when I track down the RIC number, the coin belongs to a certain “period” of his "undated coins," leaving me simply to date the coin to his general reign of 270-275 A.D. Pictured is RIC 5.151; from Part 1 of RIC volume 5, p. 281. According to RIC, this coin was struck during “Period III” of his undated coins, but that doesn’t seem to do me much good in dating the coin. Maybe I'm missing something or using RIC incorrectly. Has more progress been made in dating the coins of Aurelian and his 3rd-century cohorts? Is there a trick to dating these “periods” defined by RIC? Or are the regnal years the best we can do for most coins of this chaotic period? [ATTACH=full]650734[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Aurelian's "undated" coins
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...