Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Valentinian, post: 3123249, member: 44316&quot;]This is true, but produces a problem for the collector who wants a really nice example--making it hard to illustrate how &quot;trashy&quot; they were if the example is too nice!</p><p><br /></p><p>Here are two attempts of mine:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]795184[/ATTACH] </p><p>21 mm. 4.45 grams.</p><p>Aurelian, struck Oct. - Nov. 270 at Siscia.</p><p>CONCORDIA MILI, Concordia holding two standards</p><p>Sear III 11518 variety. RIC 192 variety. Estiot -- cf. plate 22, 682-704, all of which are similar but all have officina letters and this example does not.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]795185[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>19-18 mm. </p><p>Aurelian. Struck early in his reign, pre-reform.</p><p>DACIA FELIX, Dacia standing holding the staff with animal&#039;s head associated with Dacia, which is an ironic type since Dacia was lost in 275, not long after this coin was issued.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in