Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Marsyas Mike, post: 3119059, member: 85693&quot;]Thank you zumbly - I really appreciate this information.&nbsp; I will correct my attribution accordingly...and humbly withdraw my claims of a Gallienus hybrid...</p><p><br /></p><p>That website is interesting - thank you for the link.&nbsp; I am not sure I entirely understand it - there I did find a reference to Gallienus for RIC 62 (the old RIC, from what I understand) - mine is RIC 63 because of the obverse legend (no C before CLAVDIVS).&nbsp; Both RIC 62 and 63 have an X in the reverse field.</p><p><br /></p><p>&quot;<b>Note</b> a) 2 coins in V, a coin in L, a coin in C, and a coin in NY have the reverse VIRTVS AVGVSTI X/-//- - Virtus 4a - hybrids, reverse of Gallienus.</p><p><b>Reference</b> Normanby 685 <b>RIC1st</b> 62&quot;</p><p><br /></p><p>This is described as &quot;RIC temp #270&quot; - the new RIC number, I presume?</p><p><br /></p><p>Wildwinds has the Gallienus reverse die reference for both RIC 62 and 63.&nbsp; I am assuming this is old information now superseded? </p><p><br /></p><p>Since I have to go to work I didn&#039;t really have time to delve into it yet, but I am definitely going to use this site to attribute my tiny collection from this era. </p><p><br /></p><p>Thanks again - this is interesting.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in