Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Aurelian / Sol Bilion Ant
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2612541, member: 19463"]RIC ID's do not change for the differences in workshops that produced matching coins. They will list a coin P for Prima or the first shop but users are expected to have understood that means the same number applies to other shops, in this case Quarta or shop 4. However, your coin does not read QXXT as it should to be RIC 151 but QXXI which is not listed that I can find in RIC but is mentioned as a variant in the text where the authors speculate the coin may belong to Siscia rather than Ticinum. My advice is to abandon RIC for this period and go to the online update site where the coin is shown in several examples as <font size="6">RIC temp #1527:</font></p><p><a href="http://www.ric.mom.fr/en/coin/1527?tempRIC=&asmSelect0=&Reign=Aurelianus&asmSelect1=&asmSelect2=&asmSelect3=&asmSelect4=&asmSelect5=&asmSelect6=&asmSelect7=&asmSelect8=&asmSelect9=&ReverseMark=%2A%2F%E2%80%93%2F%2FQXXI&asmSelect10=&asmSelect11=&BustDescription=&ReverseDescription=&Note=&Reference=&page=1&mod=result&from=advanced" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.ric.mom.fr/en/coin/1527?tempRIC=&asmSelect0=&Reign=Aurelianus&asmSelect1=&asmSelect2=&asmSelect3=&asmSelect4=&asmSelect5=&asmSelect6=&asmSelect7=&asmSelect8=&asmSelect9=&ReverseMark=%2A%2F%E2%80%93%2F%2FQXXI&asmSelect10=&asmSelect11=&BustDescription=&ReverseDescription=&Note=&Reference=&page=1&mod=result&from=advanced" rel="nofollow">http://www.ric.mom.fr/en/coin/1527?tempRIC=&asmSelect0=&Reign=Aurelianus&asmSelect1=&asmSelect2=&asmSelect3=&asmSelect4=&asmSelect5=&asmSelect6=&asmSelect7=&asmSelect8=&asmSelect9=&ReverseMark=*/–//QXXI&asmSelect10=&asmSelect11=&BustDescription=&ReverseDescription=&Note=&Reference=&page=1&mod=result&from=advanced</a></p><p><br /></p><p>or (if the short form works?)</p><p><a href="http://www.ric.mom.fr/en/coin/1527" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.ric.mom.fr/en/coin/1527" rel="nofollow">http://www.ric.mom.fr/en/coin/1527</a></p><p><br /></p><p>The fact that they have 19 of them listed suggests the lack of a RIC number does not indicate rarity but only confusion indicating why RIC volume V really is in need of the update. They give the reference:</p><p><br /></p><p>LV 4835-43 from a work unknown to me:</p><p><i>Ripostiglio della Venèra. Nuovo Catalogo Illustrato</i>. J.-B. Giard, <i>volume I : Gordiano III-Quintillo</i> (Roma, 1995) S. Estiot, <i>volume II/1 : Aureliano</i> (Roma, 1995) S. Estiot, <i>volume II/2 : Tacito e Floriano</i> (Verona, 1987)</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>This stuff can require a bit more study than I have interest to support. I do not have an exact match. Mine is a Rome mint version which you are invited to try to find in the RIC temp site just for practice. Learning the workings of theeir search system will come in handy if you collect coins of this period but it may not seem easy at first. Enjoy the process.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]571819[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2612541, member: 19463"]RIC ID's do not change for the differences in workshops that produced matching coins. They will list a coin P for Prima or the first shop but users are expected to have understood that means the same number applies to other shops, in this case Quarta or shop 4. However, your coin does not read QXXT as it should to be RIC 151 but QXXI which is not listed that I can find in RIC but is mentioned as a variant in the text where the authors speculate the coin may belong to Siscia rather than Ticinum. My advice is to abandon RIC for this period and go to the online update site where the coin is shown in several examples as [SIZE=6]RIC temp #1527:[/SIZE] [url]http://www.ric.mom.fr/en/coin/1527?tempRIC=&asmSelect0=&Reign=Aurelianus&asmSelect1=&asmSelect2=&asmSelect3=&asmSelect4=&asmSelect5=&asmSelect6=&asmSelect7=&asmSelect8=&asmSelect9=&ReverseMark=%2A%2F%E2%80%93%2F%2FQXXI&asmSelect10=&asmSelect11=&BustDescription=&ReverseDescription=&Note=&Reference=&page=1&mod=result&from=advanced[/url] or (if the short form works?) [url]http://www.ric.mom.fr/en/coin/1527[/url] The fact that they have 19 of them listed suggests the lack of a RIC number does not indicate rarity but only confusion indicating why RIC volume V really is in need of the update. They give the reference: LV 4835-43 from a work unknown to me: [I]Ripostiglio della Venèra. Nuovo Catalogo Illustrato[/I]. J.-B. Giard, [I]volume I : Gordiano III-Quintillo[/I] (Roma, 1995) S. Estiot, [I]volume II/1 : Aureliano[/I] (Roma, 1995) S. Estiot, [I]volume II/2 : Tacito e Floriano[/I] (Verona, 1987) This stuff can require a bit more study than I have interest to support. I do not have an exact match. Mine is a Rome mint version which you are invited to try to find in the RIC temp site just for practice. Learning the workings of theeir search system will come in handy if you collect coins of this period but it may not seem easy at first. Enjoy the process. [ATTACH=full]571819[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Aurelian / Sol Bilion Ant
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...