Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Aurelian and the Revolt of Felicissimus
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Finn235, post: 3524526, member: 98035"]Recent pick up from a bottom-of-the-barrel auction lot.</p><p><br /></p><p>Roman Empire</p><p>Aurelian, 270 - 275</p><p>AE pre-reform Antoninianus, Rome mint, 12th officina</p><p><b>17mm, 1.54g</b></p><p>Obv: (IMP CL DOM AURELIANVS AVG), Radiate draped bust right</p><p>Rev: (LAETITIA A)VG, Laetitia standing, holding wreath and anchor, XII right field</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]936181[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>Humans, as with all omnivorous animals, have a streak of scavenger in our blood. Tonight is trash night, and my wife will give me her weekly eye-roll as I go for a midnight stroll to look for discarded treasures. I freely admit that in spite of my morals, my code of honor, and decades of social conditioning, holding a fat wad of $100 bills that isn't mine would send some dark thoughts murmuring up from my id. I have spent about half of my professional career gathering evidence that our project funding isn't going into a black box for Enron-esque budget skimming by execs and middle management.</p><p><br /></p><p>One such classic example comes from the mint in ancient Rome under the reigns of Claudius II, Quintillus, and Aurelian. The mint was under the supervision of one Felicissimus, who received periodic orders to debase the antoninianus yet again. Officially, by the death of Claudius II, it was about 2-3% silver and weighed about 2-3 grams. Who would miss a little silver at that point? </p><p><br /></p><p>Felicissimus, either by his own instruction or else gross incompetence, allowed the product of the Rome mint to slip well below officially tolerable levels. Silver was removed from the coin alloy, and went straight into pockets. This went largely ignored while Claudius struggled with the barbarian hordes, and Quintillus never even made it to Rome. Aurelian, however, caught word of what was transpiring and sought to make an example. What exactly transpired next is poorly documented, but Felicissimus was put to death for his crimes and the mint workers rose up in rebellion, probably aided by soldiers whose allegiance they had bought with their illicit profits. The result is that the mint at Rome was shut down for at least a couple years, and ancient sources estimate casualties just on Aurelian's side at about 7,000. Some believe that survivors of the rebellion fled from the city and set up shop elsewhere, making illegal DIVO CLAVDIO antoninianii of clearly barbarous fabric but otherwise good artistry and literacy.</p><p><br /></p><p>Post any coins you deem relevant![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Finn235, post: 3524526, member: 98035"]Recent pick up from a bottom-of-the-barrel auction lot. Roman Empire Aurelian, 270 - 275 AE pre-reform Antoninianus, Rome mint, 12th officina [B]17mm, 1.54g[/B] Obv: (IMP CL DOM AURELIANVS AVG), Radiate draped bust right Rev: (LAETITIA A)VG, Laetitia standing, holding wreath and anchor, XII right field [ATTACH=full]936181[/ATTACH] Humans, as with all omnivorous animals, have a streak of scavenger in our blood. Tonight is trash night, and my wife will give me her weekly eye-roll as I go for a midnight stroll to look for discarded treasures. I freely admit that in spite of my morals, my code of honor, and decades of social conditioning, holding a fat wad of $100 bills that isn't mine would send some dark thoughts murmuring up from my id. I have spent about half of my professional career gathering evidence that our project funding isn't going into a black box for Enron-esque budget skimming by execs and middle management. One such classic example comes from the mint in ancient Rome under the reigns of Claudius II, Quintillus, and Aurelian. The mint was under the supervision of one Felicissimus, who received periodic orders to debase the antoninianus yet again. Officially, by the death of Claudius II, it was about 2-3% silver and weighed about 2-3 grams. Who would miss a little silver at that point? Felicissimus, either by his own instruction or else gross incompetence, allowed the product of the Rome mint to slip well below officially tolerable levels. Silver was removed from the coin alloy, and went straight into pockets. This went largely ignored while Claudius struggled with the barbarian hordes, and Quintillus never even made it to Rome. Aurelian, however, caught word of what was transpiring and sought to make an example. What exactly transpired next is poorly documented, but Felicissimus was put to death for his crimes and the mint workers rose up in rebellion, probably aided by soldiers whose allegiance they had bought with their illicit profits. The result is that the mint at Rome was shut down for at least a couple years, and ancient sources estimate casualties just on Aurelian's side at about 7,000. Some believe that survivors of the rebellion fled from the city and set up shop elsewhere, making illegal DIVO CLAVDIO antoninianii of clearly barbarous fabric but otherwise good artistry and literacy. Post any coins you deem relevant![/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Aurelian and the Revolt of Felicissimus
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...