Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;jamesicus, post: 4618238, member: 14873&quot;]I mostly agree with everything you say, [USER=106566]@DCCR[/USER] (except for the bit relating to Andrew Burnett&#039;s paper, for I have not read it), and I am not just buttering you up. I appreciate the amount of time and effort you have devoted to this - you are far ahead of me in understanding the timeline of the campaign (as is Curtis Clay of course). I</p><p>somewhat agree with your observation: “ …………… My main quibble with Elliot&#039;s timeline is the start. Nothing is done in 208 AD, and *everything* happens in 209 AD. Reed has them moving North and securing as far as Fife in 208 AD which makes more sense to me …………… “. [EDITED]: On re-reading that part, I think Septimius found out that there was going to be a lot more preparation required than he had anticipated before they could take to the field in 208 - and that led to a good bit of delay before the field operations got underway. [END EDIT]</p><p><br /></p><p>My reading speed has slowed down considerably (I fall asleep while reading quite often these days) but I will keep plugging away.</p><p><br /></p><p>James[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in