Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;AncientJoe, post: 7552922, member: 44357&quot;]Coming back to this thread, I agree with this assessment as well: the scratches didn&#039;t look terrible in the original photo from the auction house when viewing this thread on a smartphone but the in-hand pictures tell a very different story. I was assuming NGC was complaining about the obverse cheek - the reverse is by far the larger issue and probably does indeed merit a 1/5 rating.</p><p><br /></p><p>Again, it shows why in-hand inspections are critical and how COVID has added challenges at every layer throughout the coin industry.</p><p><br /></p><p>The auction house is still not contractually obligated to accept a return based on condition but hopefully they&#039;ll recognize that they should have been more forthright with disclosing issues (or to use a better loupe when cataloging!)[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in