Auction listed coin-Fake?

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by MerlinAurelius, Jul 5, 2017.

  1. MerlinAurelius

    MerlinAurelius Well-Known Member

    Saw someone claiming this coin listed at an auction house was fake. I would like to know what the consensus is here on this coin. Real or fake?
    fake.jpg
     
    Pellinore likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Bing

    Bing Illegitimi non carborundum Supporter

    I cannot tell you fake or authentic, but I do not like the looks of the obverse. Just not right.
     
    MerlinAurelius, Pellinore and Smojo like this.
  4. Nerva

    Nerva Well-Known Member

    I agree - but to reiterate your point that it's not settled, there can be a lot of variation between dies. Analogously sometimes old master paintings look plainly wrong and totally out of time, but have secure provenance or technical evidence that they're genuinely old.
     
    MerlinAurelius and Mikey Zee like this.
  5. Bing

    Bing Illegitimi non carborundum Supporter

    That's why I won't call it out as fake. It might help to know the weight and measurements as well.
     
    Nerva likes this.
  6. Nerva

    Nerva Well-Known Member

    IMG_0539.JPG
    This from a recent auction really bothered me. I went to view the sale and asked auctioneer. They just said it had 'been through their processes' and that there was a money-back guarantee of authenticity. Beware those guarantees, I say! It's extremely hard to prove that something is certainly a fake. It isn't worth the hassle of suing them, and if you did the courts would find it hard to understand the evidence. I'm not saying it's fake, but I wasn't surprised that it didn't sell.
     
  7. Ed Snible

    Ed Snible Well-Known Member

  8. red_spork

    red_spork Triumvir monetalis

    The person who pointed it out is an expert on these types and seems to believe it is of modern style so I'm inclined to agree with him. The auction house pulled it so they seem to agree as well.
     
    Nerva likes this.
  9. Nerva

    Nerva Well-Known Member

    I'm not disagreeing on the specific case, and it certainly looks close to the fake die above, but experts aren't infallible and there are false positives and false negatives. Plenty of cases of experts who have devoted careers to a narrow specialty and still been caught out. There's a picture at Sotheby's tonight that looks like it was painted in the 1930s. Loads of experts have dismissed it. But it's probably a Frans Hals. Technical evidence places it securely in the seventeenth century.
     
  10. Bing

    Bing Illegitimi non carborundum Supporter

    In this case I believe the expert to be correct. It is a close match to the fake shown by @Ed Snible
     
    Andres2 likes this.
  11. Amentia

    Amentia New Member

  12. Theodosius

    Theodosius Fine Style Seeker

    Welcome Amentia!

    Tell us about your collecting interests.

    John
     
  13. gregarious

    gregarious E Pluribus Unum

    ehhh..could be... not a exact match for the forgery but very close. it just doesn't "look" ancient made nor old.
     
    Nerva likes this.
  14. ancient coin hunter

    ancient coin hunter 3rd Century Usurper

    Something about that coin is troublesome, portraiture appears to be non-ancient.
     
  15. ValiantKnight

    ValiantKnight Well-Known Member

    I think he might be the oldest member here on CT... 106 years old.
     
  16. Theodosius

    Theodosius Fine Style Seeker

    I noticed that! Congratulations!
     
  17. Theodosius

    Theodosius Fine Style Seeker

    Actually I am guessing that is a mistake.

    :)
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page