Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;mrbrklyn, post: 474916, member: 4381&quot;]Paul - your campaigning and confusing people.&nbsp; You shouldn&#039;t use the term AU-64 because it is meaningless and confusing.&nbsp; A 64 is an MS grade, not a AU grade.&nbsp; Your campaigning.&nbsp; I don&#039;t know why.&nbsp; It seems to be something etched in your DNA.&nbsp; All the points you make can be right until you make an effort to &quot;coin&quot; the term AU63.&nbsp; Then your wrong.&nbsp; There is no AU63 and there is no AU63 concept.&nbsp; And this is not stirring the pot.&nbsp; This is the miss use of nomenclature.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>Standards have been devised and accept and an AU58 can no more be a AU63 than an Elephant can be called a land-whale.&nbsp; Your teaching the wrong terminology.</p><p><br /></p><p>Ruben[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in