Attribution Request - Athens Tetradrachm, pre-"Mass" type

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by Finn235, Nov 1, 2019.

  1. Finn235

    Finn235 Well-Known Member

    It spent a good long while in the US customs black hole, but my Ares win is finally here! Picked this one up only vaguely attributed for a bit less than the price of a "mass" owl.

    Athens early tetradrachm.jpg
    23mm, 17.18g

    I am thinking this might be a Starr Group V? The owl is a bit more natural with a smaller head cocked slightly to the right, and although the numbers dont seem that different, in hand this is markedly smaller and more chunky than my "mass" owl:
    Athens tet early vs mass.jpg

    What do you guys think?
     
    Peter T Davis, Ryro, Andres2 and 8 others like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. ancient times

    ancient times Legatus Legionis

    Nice coins
     
    Finn235 likes this.
  4. Al Kowsky

    Al Kowsky Well-Known Member

    Finn235, I'm no expert on Owls but your coin looks to be Starr Group V.B, circa 465 - 460 BC.
     
    spirityoda and Finn235 like this.
  5. happy_collector

    happy_collector Well-Known Member

    Nice owls, @Finn235. These pre-"Mass" Attica tetradrachms are so lovely. The owl has more "character" by simply turning its head a bit more to the left. :happy:

    The owl of my avatar coin is similar to yours.
    Clipboard01.jpg
     
  6. Kavax

    Kavax Well-Known Member

    Nice coins !
    Assigning owls to a group is a kind of an art and the Flament book is a must have if you want to do it.

    It is not a Starr group V (Flament group I) for various reasons but the main one is that none of them have an owl with a globule on its forehead.

    Your two coins have the features of the Flament group II coins struck between 440 and 404 BC
     
  7. gsimonel

    gsimonel Well-Known Member

    What is a "mass" owl?
     
  8. Al Kowsky

    Al Kowsky Well-Known Member

    Finn235, The variations in Athenian Owls are very confusing :confused:. I recommend you read the thread started by Nathan P, June 30, 2019, "Transitional Athens owl question". You'll see a variety of coins & opinions ;).
     
  9. Finn235

    Finn235 Well-Known Member

    Thanks all! I did notice the dot on the owl's forehead, but I was not sure if that was a "make or break" feature for inclusion in the pre-mass series. I had never noticed an owl tet with a tilted head described as a "mass" type before, which is why I was asking.

    @gsimonel, the "Mass" owls are the ones made on a mass scale (tens or hundreds of millions) while Athens was the pre-eminent superpower of the ancient Mediterranean, about 454-404 BC. Pre-Mass covers everything from the very rare archaic types to the iconic classic. After the start of the 4th century BC the Athens tets resumed, but with a more realistic eye facing forward rather than out toward the viewer.

    As mentioned, there are books on the subject, but from what I have seen, they are quite pricey, as one might expect for a specialist numismatic work.
     
    Alegandron and Marsyas Mike like this.
  10. Marsyas Mike

    Marsyas Mike Well-Known Member

    Thanks for the "mass" owl definition. I was enjoying this thread (owl-less though I am) but I'd never heard the term.
     
  11. tartanhill

    tartanhill Well-Known Member


    Do not the Starr group coins also have three separate tail feathers rather than three grouped together?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page