Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Attribution of PL and DMPL on raw coins
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 1508769, member: 112"]NGC has always had an 8" minimum for DMPL, PCGS used to be 4-6". But if I remember correctly it says someplace on their web site that they use 8" now. So I'll agree about them getting tougher on that. But my grading standards haven't changed in 20 years. </p><p><br /></p><p>Sure I've made my share of mistakes in grading just like anybody else. If you read my comment from earlier, I said I was never wrong on a DMPL - I didn't say any coin. DMPLs are really one of the easier coins to grade IMO. I mean the reflectivity is either there or it isn't. So it's pretty hard to miss that. And if the reflectivity and frost is there, then marks are also easier to see. It's kind of like grading Proofs, they are easier to grade too, for the same reasons.</p><p><br /></p><p>And if I am wrong about the TPG standards having changed, then why do so many other numismatic authors and "experts" agree with me ? For several years now the number of articles on the subject has done nothing but steadily increase. They see the same things I see, and have been seeing.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 1508769, member: 112"]NGC has always had an 8" minimum for DMPL, PCGS used to be 4-6". But if I remember correctly it says someplace on their web site that they use 8" now. So I'll agree about them getting tougher on that. But my grading standards haven't changed in 20 years. Sure I've made my share of mistakes in grading just like anybody else. If you read my comment from earlier, I said I was never wrong on a DMPL - I didn't say any coin. DMPLs are really one of the easier coins to grade IMO. I mean the reflectivity is either there or it isn't. So it's pretty hard to miss that. And if the reflectivity and frost is there, then marks are also easier to see. It's kind of like grading Proofs, they are easier to grade too, for the same reasons. And if I am wrong about the TPG standards having changed, then why do so many other numismatic authors and "experts" agree with me ? For several years now the number of articles on the subject has done nothing but steadily increase. They see the same things I see, and have been seeing.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Attribution of PL and DMPL on raw coins
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...