Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Marshall, post: 3182554, member: 21705&quot;]I can identify the obverse as 14 from the positions of the date and the HWH (Highest Wave of Hair) and SHWH (Second Highest Wave of Hair) under R and E rather than between them. </p><p><br /></p><p>Obverse 2 is close, but the reverse is just good enough to eliminate the Reverse of 96s. I also hate the Reverse of 96 terminology since it is actually a Reverse of 95. But tradition dictates 96.</p><p><br /></p><p>Obverse 14 was used on S-136 R3- and S-137 R2.</p><p><br /></p><p>While the reverse can be identified as a reverse of 97 from the shape of the loops, the Reverse is too far gone because it doesn&#039;t look like either reverse which is paired up with Obverse 14. </p><p><br /></p><p>In fact, with a distant&nbsp; A (or what I think might be the A) well away from the ribbon on the right side, the right stem pointing to the right leg of A (toward the fraction)&nbsp; and what appears to be the left leg of the N pointing to the gap between the loops, it looks more like Reverse C which was used on the NC-2.</p><p><br /></p><p>This makes me question what I think I&#039;m seeing, so for me, unattributable.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in