Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Conder101, post: 3014996, member: 66&quot;]Breen says that 229 I and II were struck before the LAST of 227.&nbsp;&nbsp; I believe the emission sequence would be </p><p>&nbsp;S-226, NC-1, S-227 I, II, and some of III, S-229 States I and II, re-marriage of S-227 III, S-229 State III, NC-2, and S-229 States IV through VII.&nbsp; Both 227 and 229 had interrupted marriages.&nbsp; That would result in the the crumbled N being on stages I and II of S-229 as well.&nbsp; I suspect Breen is wrong about S-229 not having the crumbled N because you obviously have an early stage 229 that does have it.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in