Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Marshall, post: 2772500, member: 21705&quot;][ATTACH=full]639710[/ATTACH]</p><p>This is plausible since the 95-C was paired with two reverses and one has two sub-varieties and the die state indicates the second variety was struck after some and before other die states of the first. Obverse 96-3 was paired with four reverses so a brief pairing with an old reverse could easily have occurred.</p><p><br /></p><p>While worn, it does appear to be weak in all the areas described in die state IX.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in