Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Athena and Polly
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="robinjojo, post: 4578732, member: 110226"]One of the advantages, if one could call it that, of having a failing memory is the joy of rediscovering a coin that was assumed to be long gone. It's almost as good as a new acquisition coming through the door.</p><p><br /></p><p>This is one such coin, a coin that is not of a feather, at least as an owl would be concerned. It is an Attica tetradrachm of the late 3rd - early 2nd centuries BC. It was acquired from Harlan Berk in the last century (impressive, isn't it?), in 1991.</p><p><br /></p><p>The features of this coin are quite unusual, and I am almost inclined to say it is not Athenian at all, but I guess it is.</p><p><br /></p><p>On the obverse, there's the expected profile eye portrait of Athena. However, her hair line is much reduced and it eventually disappears with the new style tetradrachms. The edge of the helmet has a fancy curl over the ear, and the end tendrils of the floral ornament are thick, almost resembling leaves from a tropical plant. Additionally, look at how Athena's eye opens up more, at both ends, giving the lower lid a more natural appearance. This style of eye carries on into the new style tetradrachms, with some refinements.</p><p><br /></p><p>The reverse, which is really different, does not have an owl, but a parrot! No, I guess it is an owl, or perhaps a hybrid owl-parrot (a parowlot?). The feathers are rendered a large dots, and the owl has thick lower feathers, covering the legs almost like the old flapper dresses of the 1920's. If fact, I imagine this owl would be quite good doing the Charleston. Other features: a very large crescent moon, seemingly conjoined with the olive leaves. It seems that these two elements were engraved in a single die punch. Also, the owl's eyes are decidedly un-owl like, but maybe this happens to these critters if they eat too many crackers.</p><p><br /></p><p>Harlan Berk dated this coin in very broad terms, 293-166 BC. I think it is more likely that it post dates the quadridigité tendril style of 286-262 BC and is more of an early 2nd century creation, pre-dating the "new style" tetradrachms.</p><p><br /></p><p>There is an apparent very small countermark on the upper lip of Athena, but I cannot make out what it is.</p><p><br /></p><p>Athens, Late 3rd - early 2nd centuries BC</p><p>Tetradrachm</p><p>Obverse: Athena facing right, countermark on cheek</p><p>Reverse: Facing Owl, AOE to the right, crescent moon and olive leaves left</p><p>16.96 grams</p><p>21 mm, 12 h.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1133718[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="robinjojo, post: 4578732, member: 110226"]One of the advantages, if one could call it that, of having a failing memory is the joy of rediscovering a coin that was assumed to be long gone. It's almost as good as a new acquisition coming through the door. This is one such coin, a coin that is not of a feather, at least as an owl would be concerned. It is an Attica tetradrachm of the late 3rd - early 2nd centuries BC. It was acquired from Harlan Berk in the last century (impressive, isn't it?), in 1991. The features of this coin are quite unusual, and I am almost inclined to say it is not Athenian at all, but I guess it is. On the obverse, there's the expected profile eye portrait of Athena. However, her hair line is much reduced and it eventually disappears with the new style tetradrachms. The edge of the helmet has a fancy curl over the ear, and the end tendrils of the floral ornament are thick, almost resembling leaves from a tropical plant. Additionally, look at how Athena's eye opens up more, at both ends, giving the lower lid a more natural appearance. This style of eye carries on into the new style tetradrachms, with some refinements. The reverse, which is really different, does not have an owl, but a parrot! No, I guess it is an owl, or perhaps a hybrid owl-parrot (a parowlot?). The feathers are rendered a large dots, and the owl has thick lower feathers, covering the legs almost like the old flapper dresses of the 1920's. If fact, I imagine this owl would be quite good doing the Charleston. Other features: a very large crescent moon, seemingly conjoined with the olive leaves. It seems that these two elements were engraved in a single die punch. Also, the owl's eyes are decidedly un-owl like, but maybe this happens to these critters if they eat too many crackers. Harlan Berk dated this coin in very broad terms, 293-166 BC. I think it is more likely that it post dates the quadridigité tendril style of 286-262 BC and is more of an early 2nd century creation, pre-dating the "new style" tetradrachms. There is an apparent very small countermark on the upper lip of Athena, but I cannot make out what it is. Athens, Late 3rd - early 2nd centuries BC Tetradrachm Obverse: Athena facing right, countermark on cheek Reverse: Facing Owl, AOE to the right, crescent moon and olive leaves left 16.96 grams 21 mm, 12 h. [ATTACH=full]1133718[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Athena and Polly
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...