Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Athen Starr IV Group tetradrachm authentic ?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Amentia, post: 2876898, member: 78973"]It is about the coin and not the dealer.</p><p>A fake will not become genuine only because it was sold by a reputable auction house or dealer. And sometimes even fake sellers mix some worn authentic coins to their offer, too. </p><p>I do not care who sold it I only care how it looks in hand!</p><p>You buy the coin and not the dealer <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p>There are and were even much more obvious fakes for sale by reputable auction houses or dealer. </p><p><br /></p><p>I am confident that it is a die match to the CNG specimen, there will be always some minor differences due to striking and the dies will wear with usage and die flaws and breaks etc will appear (so coins from the same dies, which were struck at a different die state will show some differences, too). (There is possibly a die shift/slippage on the last two letters of the CNG specimen, picture is to bad to tell for sure) </p><p><br /></p><p>The CNG coin is possibly authentic not possibe to tell form this low resolution picture. </p><p><br /></p><p>My coin is a very obvious fake even in pictures, I only wanted to see if others here will know why it is fake, too. I posted it under another nick, because I feared that some would realize, that it must be fake because I do collect fakes and becuse I am only interested in fakes<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie3" alt=":(" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p>I apologize for that and the weight is actually 18g+ (too heavy should be about 17,3g) but with the correct weight no one would actually care for the picture and fakes from these dies (they are transfer die fakes) exist with correct weight see for example the ACR fake </p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.coinarchives.com/a/lotviewer.php?LotID=1037669&AucID=2022&Lot=131&Val=e9959876310175b00c78820b723888ad" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.coinarchives.com/a/lotviewer.php?LotID=1037669&AucID=2022&Lot=131&Val=e9959876310175b00c78820b723888ad" rel="nofollow">https://www.coinarchives.com/a/lotviewer.php?LotID=1037669&AucID=2022&Lot=131&Val=e9959876310175b00c78820b723888ad</a></p><p><br /></p><p><b> ACR Auctions</b> <b>></b> <b>Auction 37</b> <b>Auction date:</b> 19 September 2017</p><p><b>Lot number:</b> 131</p><p><br /></p><p>The toning is artificial but it looks different in hand than on pictures and yes you will not find such a toning on authentic coins but the toning is not that bad. </p><p>(David was correct.)</p><p>David referred to the fake in forgery network, the fake on forgery network is from "Galvano Boys" they used electrotypes of the Brithish museum and recutted details (so recutted transfer dies). So you thought in the right direction, the problem of this "Galvano Boys" fakes were that the details were too soft even on protected areas, there will be always a detail loss and transfer errors in transfer dies and they often do recut details wrong for example the dotted border (different size, number and position).</p><p><br /></p><p>There is a very obvious problem on these fakes, which I do not understand.</p><p>On the reverse there is always a "incuse square" and some higher areas outside the incuse square. Some of this higher areas have been artificially flatted on my and the ACR fake. (last picture)</p><p> </p><p>The flan itself does not look good, the details especially the owl on the reverse are very good.</p><p><br /></p><p>If you neglect the weight, then I daresay that my fake is better and more convincing than the ACR fake sold (19 September 2017). </p><p><br /></p><p>It is not that easy to get good fakes, the really good fakes will be directly placed at auctions, the very bad fakes will be sold at ebay (restbazar etc.).</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Why do I post this, it seems like this fake (if it would have correct weight), would have fooled some here and such a fake fooled ACR and the buyer.</p><p><br /></p><p>I bought it in a lot with another tetradrachm and a bronze fake.</p><p>The bronze fake is very deceptive and should fool many auction houses and collectors. The tetradrachms are not really deceptive <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie3" alt=":(" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Amentia, post: 2876898, member: 78973"]It is about the coin and not the dealer. A fake will not become genuine only because it was sold by a reputable auction house or dealer. And sometimes even fake sellers mix some worn authentic coins to their offer, too. I do not care who sold it I only care how it looks in hand! You buy the coin and not the dealer :) There are and were even much more obvious fakes for sale by reputable auction houses or dealer. I am confident that it is a die match to the CNG specimen, there will be always some minor differences due to striking and the dies will wear with usage and die flaws and breaks etc will appear (so coins from the same dies, which were struck at a different die state will show some differences, too). (There is possibly a die shift/slippage on the last two letters of the CNG specimen, picture is to bad to tell for sure) The CNG coin is possibly authentic not possibe to tell form this low resolution picture. My coin is a very obvious fake even in pictures, I only wanted to see if others here will know why it is fake, too. I posted it under another nick, because I feared that some would realize, that it must be fake because I do collect fakes and becuse I am only interested in fakes:( I apologize for that and the weight is actually 18g+ (too heavy should be about 17,3g) but with the correct weight no one would actually care for the picture and fakes from these dies (they are transfer die fakes) exist with correct weight see for example the ACR fake [url]https://www.coinarchives.com/a/lotviewer.php?LotID=1037669&AucID=2022&Lot=131&Val=e9959876310175b00c78820b723888ad[/url] [B] ACR Auctions[/B] [B]>[/B] [B]Auction 37[/B] [B]Auction date:[/B] 19 September 2017 [B]Lot number:[/B] 131 The toning is artificial but it looks different in hand than on pictures and yes you will not find such a toning on authentic coins but the toning is not that bad. (David was correct.) David referred to the fake in forgery network, the fake on forgery network is from "Galvano Boys" they used electrotypes of the Brithish museum and recutted details (so recutted transfer dies). So you thought in the right direction, the problem of this "Galvano Boys" fakes were that the details were too soft even on protected areas, there will be always a detail loss and transfer errors in transfer dies and they often do recut details wrong for example the dotted border (different size, number and position). There is a very obvious problem on these fakes, which I do not understand. On the reverse there is always a "incuse square" and some higher areas outside the incuse square. Some of this higher areas have been artificially flatted on my and the ACR fake. (last picture) The flan itself does not look good, the details especially the owl on the reverse are very good. If you neglect the weight, then I daresay that my fake is better and more convincing than the ACR fake sold (19 September 2017). It is not that easy to get good fakes, the really good fakes will be directly placed at auctions, the very bad fakes will be sold at ebay (restbazar etc.). Why do I post this, it seems like this fake (if it would have correct weight), would have fooled some here and such a fake fooled ACR and the buyer. I bought it in a lot with another tetradrachm and a bronze fake. The bronze fake is very deceptive and should fool many auction houses and collectors. The tetradrachms are not really deceptive :([/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Athen Starr IV Group tetradrachm authentic ?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...