Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;medoraman, post: 1366781, member: 26302&quot;]I clicked on the link and expected some monstrosity of a VF coin. What I saw at least from the pics did not look implausible. Did any of you factor in more 1930 SL quarters were put away in original rolls than other dates? Did you factor that these were dispersed a lot in the 50s when they have sulphur containing folders? When thinking of AT versus NT you have to remember facts like what was happening with issues and the like. I used to find many 1930 BU SL&#039;s toned. If a collector would have one BU SL, it would be a 1930, so naturally they toned more than any other date. </p><p><br /></p><p>I could be wrong on this one, but on the surface I am not suspicious. IF it would have been a date other than the 30 I would have been more suspicious, or IF it would have been lower grade. As it is, it looked plausible this coin could be NT. I would need better pics to be sure one way or the other, (to the extent any of this could ever be &quot;sure&quot;). </p><p><br /></p><p>Chris[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in