Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Michael Stolt, post: 3907472, member: 100445&quot;]After two months on the day since I won this amazing coin over at the Roma XVIII marathon auction, it is at last in my hands. I&#039;m extremely happy, excited and proud to be able to add a second Marsic coin minted during the Social War to the collection. As icing on the cake it also has great provenance, and the coin is published in Alberto Campanas work on the coinage. The eight standing soldiers on the reverse most likely represent eight of the tribes that took part in the conflict, the Marsi, Picentines, Paeligni, Marrucini, Vestini, Frentani, Samnites and Hirpini. The legend behind the obverse bust of Italia is engraved in latin, contrary to the Italia/Bull type that has &quot;Italia&quot; engraved in oscan. The reason behind this most likely derives in the fact that some tribes were latin speaking, while others spoke oscan in the southern parts of Italy. It feels great to now have one of each type to be able to show these linguistic differences present on the Social War coinage.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1029961[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p><b>The Social War. Coinage of the Marsic Confederation.</b> AR Denarius (19mm, 3.64 g, 6h). Corfinium mint. Struck 90 BC.</p><p><br /></p><p>Obverse: <i>Laureate head of Italia left, ITALIA upwards behind.</i></p><p><br /></p><p>Reverse: <i>Oath-taking scene: Youth kneeling by standard, holding pig at which eight soldiers (four on each side) point their swords, C in exergue.</i></p><p><br /></p><p>Reference: Campana 63i (this coin), D36/R54.</p><p><br /></p><p>Provenance: Ex Roma Numismatics, Auction XVIII (29 September 2019), lot 842; Ex Baldwin&#039;s Auctions Ltd - M&amp;M Numismatics Ltd - Italo Vecchi Ltd, The New York Sale I (3 December 1998), lot 4; Ex &#039;R. J. Graham&#039; (Paul Tinchant) Collection, J. Schulman, Auction 243 (8 June 1966), lot 1400.</p><p>Published in A. Campana, La monetazione degli insorti Italici durante la guerra sociale 91-87 A.C. (Modena, 1987)</p><p><br /></p><p>&quot;A new era of violence and conflict visited the Republic when in 91 B.C. Marcus Livius Drusus, a new Tribune with ideas much like the Gracchi brothers, acted as advocate for the urban and rural poor and the indigenous Italian peoples. Not only did he double the size of the senate by promoting 300 leading equites, but he tried to modify grain laws and to address old grievances over land distribution and eligibility for citizenship. Drusus&#039; actions aroused such anger that he was murdered before his term had ended. It was the proverbial straw that broke the camel’s back, and the response among Rome’s Italian allies – who for decades had petitioned fruitlessly for improved status – was to break into revolt. The rebels comprised several Italian tribes, with the Marsi and the Samnites assuming leading roles in what came to be known as the Social War (91-87 B.C.). The capital of their breakaway state was Corfinium, where the rebels established a parallel system modeled on the institutions of the Republic, complete with a senate, consuls and praetors, and the prerogative to issue coins. After a faltering start, the Romans gained traction under the military leadership of Gaius Marius and Lucius Julius Caesar. None the less, the war was costly and destructive, and Caesar hoped hostilities would end when, in 90, he instituted the lex Iulia. The law granted full citizenship to Italian allies who were not actively engaged in making war on Rome. Though it represented progress, not every Italian insurgent was prepared to cease hostilities, and the war continued. Even with extraordinary generals such as Marius, Sulla and Gnaeus Pompey winning victories for the Republic, the war was so burdensome that leaders did not want to pursue it to the bitter end. Romans had been forced to raise more legions than at any time since the invasion of Hannibal, they struck more denarii in 90 than in any other year of the Republic, and from 89 to 87 silver was in such short supply that the purity of the denarius was reduced to slightly less than 95%. Perhaps the deciding factor, however, was a problem far from Italy: the Pontic King Mithradates VI was taking advantage of Rome’s distraction to expand his territories. In the darkest hour of the First Mithradatic War (89-85), Mithradates coordinated the murder in a single night of some 80,000 Romans in Asia Minor, and led an invasion of the province of Asia. With this tremendous concern, the Romans finally met the demands of the rebels for the complete enfranchisement of Italy – a promise that still required another eighteen years to fulfill. &quot;[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in