Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="dltsrq, post: 8317122, member: 75482"]Some random thoughts. It's a unilateral order, not a "memorandum of understanding". The difference is significant. Similar orders have been in effect for Afghanistan for 15 years or more. There is little or nothing new here. Only two classes of non-Afghan coins are mentioned in the order, "common Roman Imperial coins" and "Chinese coins belonging primarily to the Tang Dynasty". Both classes are further qualified by the phrase "found in archaeological contexts in Afghanistan". There is no attempt here to generally restrict Roman imperial or Chinese coins.[/QUOTE]