Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Astonishing MOU with Afghanistan
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="SeptimusT, post: 8316036, member: 91240"]Who writes these rules? As [USER=57364]@THCoins[/USER] points out, <i>Janapadas</i> were states, not coins. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie20" alt=":banghead:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> Per Wikipedia (I know, not the best source, but reliable enough for this): "The Sanskrit term <i>janapada</i> is a compound term, composed of two words: <i>janas</i> and <i>pada</i>. <i>Jana</i> means "people" or "subject" (cf. Latin cognate <i>genus</i>, English cognate <i>kin</i>). The word <i>pada</i> means "foot" (cf. Latin cognate <i>pedis</i>); from its earliest attestation, the word has had a double meaning of "realm, territory" and "subject population" (cf. Hittite <i>pedan</i>, "place")."</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>As far as I know, the nearest Mauryan mint to modern Afghanistan was <i>hypothetically </i>in Taxila, which is in modern Pakistan.</p><p><br /></p><p>Anyway, in my experience in academia dealing with the types of folks who support these rules, they tend to be overly idealistic, or just feel compelled to toe the line. There is little room for nuance.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="SeptimusT, post: 8316036, member: 91240"]Who writes these rules? As [USER=57364]@THCoins[/USER] points out, [I]Janapadas[/I] were states, not coins. :banghead: Per Wikipedia (I know, not the best source, but reliable enough for this): "The Sanskrit term [I]janapada[/I] is a compound term, composed of two words: [I]janas[/I] and [I]pada[/I]. [I]Jana[/I] means "people" or "subject" (cf. Latin cognate [I]genus[/I], English cognate [I]kin[/I]). The word [I]pada[/I] means "foot" (cf. Latin cognate [I]pedis[/I]); from its earliest attestation, the word has had a double meaning of "realm, territory" and "subject population" (cf. Hittite [I]pedan[/I], "place")." As far as I know, the nearest Mauryan mint to modern Afghanistan was [I]hypothetically [/I]in Taxila, which is in modern Pakistan. Anyway, in my experience in academia dealing with the types of folks who support these rules, they tend to be overly idealistic, or just feel compelled to toe the line. There is little room for nuance.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Astonishing MOU with Afghanistan
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...