Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Valentinian, post: 2466640, member: 44316&quot;]Our member red_spork suggested another important reference work by Harold B. Mattingly. I have read it and incorporated its arguments in the comments and dating columns. Thank you very much, red!&nbsp; Mattingly discusses the time period 150-90 BC in light of about a dozen hoards that were not available to Crawford. The biggest changes in the page are associated with the coins of c. 141 BC (The XVI type) and 137 BC (non-traditional types, including adding to the page the wolf-and-twins FOSTLVS type). The rightmost column now has Mattingly&#039;s revised dates. The fact they often differ from Crawford&#039;s dates demonstrates how hard it is to pin down Republican dates.</p><p><br /></p><p>Read the page</p><p><a href="http://esty.ancients.info/Repub/TimelineTable.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://esty.ancients.info/Repub/TimelineTable.html" rel="nofollow">http://esty.ancients.info/Repub/TimelineTable.html</a></p><p>if you want to know how it is done.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in