Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;panzerman, post: 6112953, member: 77704&quot;]I think its a fabulous coin/ the mark is hardly noticeable. Also agree with all others, that yours is way more beautifull<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> Your photo is also superior.</p><p>I collect all periods, including 19th/18th centuries, where one finds &quot;Ajustment marks&quot;. I can live with that, minor marks/ clipping/ crude strikes. However, I stay away from &quot;holed&quot;/ harshly cleaned/ smoothed/ removed from mount/ polished sort of defects.</p><p>Here is a coin from Basel/ 1653</p><p>The reverse show characteristic poor strike due to bad reverse dies. Second is a Double Souverain d&#039;or 1747 Anterpen Mint/ struck for the Austrian Netherlands/ Brabant/ Empress Maria Theresia&nbsp; note&gt; obverse die had cracks. Mint error.[ATTACH=full]1245045[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1245046[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1245039[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1245041[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in